25 Victoria Street, London, SW1H 0DL
Tel (Press): 020 7984 8121
Tel (Broadcast Desk): 020 7984 8100
Fax: 020 7984 8272
www.conservatives.com CONSERVATIVE Date 25 November 2004
Government all talk on agriculture and climate change
In the debate on the Environment bills in the Queen's Speech today, Shadow Secretary of State for DEFRA, Tim Yeo, accused the Government of ignoring agriculture and being 'all talk' on climate change.
Drawing attention to the recent announcement from the European Commission that DEFRA will only be receiving part of what it needs to support the costs of the foot and mouth outbreak, leaving the British taxpayer with a bill of £600 million, Mr Yeo denounced the Government for "bungling" the tragedy of foot and mouth, and presiding over a dramatic decline of the farming industry, leaving the country more and more dependent upon food imports.
Mr Yeo called on the Government to abolish the Over Thirty Month rule which costs the taxpayer £360 million a year and the cattle industry £100 million a year, and which both the Food Standards Agency and EU authorities have agreed is no longer necessary.
He criticised the omission of the Marine Wildlife Conservation Bill despite the fact that over half of our biodiversity exists at sea.
"Comprehensive legislation is needed to deliver a coherent planning framework for our marine environment and wildlife conservation."
He also attacked the Government for the rise in CO2 emissions and its lack of international leadership, despite the Prime Minister's professed commitment to climate change, quoting leaders of the environmental movement who have recently expressed their disappointment with the Government's record.
"How can the Government be taken seriously on climate change when it has made no effort to control the greatest contributor of all - aviation? One step forward would be the inclusion of aviation within a robust European emissions trading scheme."
He also deplored the Government's record on domestic energy efficiency and called for further fiscal measures to encourage take-up of energy efficiency materials, following the model of Conservative-led Braintree District Council.
For further information please call Tara Hamilton-Miller on 0207 984 8092
Notes to editors:
Greens declare war on Blair for 'failures' over climate change
By Marie Woolf, Chief Political Correspondent
19 November 2004
Britain's leading environmental organisation withdrew support from Tony Blair yesterday over climate change, saying he could not be trusted to reduce global warming.
Greenpeace expressed doubts about the Prime Minister's sincerity over tackling climate change, adding that his record on tackling carbon emissions was "pathetic".
The attack by Stephen Tindale, the Labour-supporting head of Greenpeace, came as Mr Blair and Jacques Chirac, the French President, said that climate change would be "one of the two priorities" for the G8 group of leading industrialised nations when Britain assumed the presidency next year. The Prime Minister has made tackling global warming a key theme of his tenure in office.
Leading environmentalists joined forces yesterday to criticise Mr Blair's record, accusing him of spin while failing to support measures to reduce carbon emissions from cars and planes.
They also accused him of not doing enough to promote energy efficiency measures in the building of new homes.
Mr Tindale, a former government special adviser on the environment who played a key role in framing Labour's policy on climate change, said Mr Blair "cannot be trusted to resist industry lobbying" from car manufacturers and airlines. "On the climate change issues we have been very supportive of the Government. We have been essentially trying to work with them to promote renewable energy. But we have basically taken a conscious decision that he [Tony Blair] can no longer be given the benefit of the doubt," he said. "So far Blair's record on climate change is almost entirely a record of fine words and no action. His repeated failures on this issue is undermining his diplomatic efforts."
Greenpeace's change of policy follows a series of meetings within the organisation which one figure said amounted to "a declaration of war". The decision to criticise Mr Blair openly over climate change follows the Government's attempts to block energy-efficiency targets in social housing which would help prevent global warming and save lives and to dilute emissions trading targets.
It also follows Downing Street's decision to "allow industry to emit as much carbon in future as it has in the past".
Mr Tindale, Greenpeace's executive director, said Mr Blair's reheated "tub-thumping speeches" on the world stage were undermined by his "failed" record in Britain.
"Emissions of carbon dioxide have actually increased since Blair became Prime Minister. So much for leadership. Through all this, Blair kept on giving the speeches and we kept on trying to believe him, perhaps for too long. We are now going to mobilise a lot more public pressure against them.''
He said the Prime Minister's "rhetoric" on wanting to tackle climate change bore no relation to his record. World leaders would "laugh at Tony Blair" because of his dismal record on reducing carbon emissions at home, Mr Tindale said. "They have completely failed on road transport and failed to control emissions from air transport. They are in complete denial."
Carbon emissions have been increasing and experts have warned Britain will not meet its target of reducing them by 20 per cent below 1990 levels by 2010. There are also fears that the Government may try to water down the target in the next few weeks when it publishes its "review" of its policy.
Tony Juniper, the executive director of Friends of the Earth, said there was a gaping "gap" between the Prime Minister's rhetoric and leadership on the world stage and his record in the UK. "The leadership position of this country is jeopardised by the position at home," he said.
"The credibility of this country on climate change is essentially derived from the policy choices taken by the Conservatives in the 1980s when they decided to shift from coal to gas generation."
Charles Secrett, the former head of Friends of the Earth who now heads ACT, a sustainable development campaign group, said Mr Blair was "all talk and no action".
"Blair thinks he can get away with boosting his green credentials by making a big speech every year on climate change," he said. "It's always about the grand scenario and when it comes to putting him own house in order it is always business as usual."
Britain's environmental leaders called on Mr Blair last night to restore their trust by pledging a crackdown on car and plane emissions and the introduction of tax incentives to go green, when he publishes his climate change review.
Mr Juniper said: "We need to shift away from road building and encouraging car use. We need to bring in fiscal incentives to switch away from coal to renewable energy."
Mr Tindale, who was aspecial adviser to Michael Meacher, a former environment minister, said Mr Blair "cannot be trusted to stand up to the motoring lobby, the airlines or even the Treasury". He added: "Fancy speeches are not enough tackling climate change requires radical action. All the evidence suggests that Blair will not provide it."
Last night, Downing Street strongly disputed Greenpeace's analysis. A spokeswoman said: "Climate change is one of the two main priorities for our presidency of the G8, which begins in January."
She added: "We are on target for our greenhouse gas obligations under the Kyoto treaty."'