Diana has sent this contribution:

 

 

So, what IS actually going on? For several days now TV and radio have

slotted little fragments about FMD into their news and current affairs

programs, usually with regard to "why we didn't vaccinate". As you know,

we've got a whole half hour to come on the subject on Thursday evening. What

are they building up to? I can only think that the results of the conference

in Bristol are about to be unleashed, so they've got to forstall them. Last

night (Tuesday) at midnight, no less, I found myself listening to speeches

from the Bristol conference, slotted in to the late night news without

warning - an interesting, if short, article, in which the lady vet, whose

name escapes me, explained what she would like to do to MAFF with the pair

of foot trimmers she was sporting, and in which Professor Brown expressed

the one wish that he would live long enough to give evidence at the future

Public Inquiry.

(Tell me if I've got the name wrong, but all these professors confuse me -

you know who I mean)

 

Early this evening Professor King appeared on our screens, in a short

snippet which told us that (wait for it) the 24hr and 48hr culls had been

the reason they got FMD under control. They produced a graph to show how the

disease had peaked just before the cull, and then had another small peak

"just as they were getting on top of it" caused by the "Phoenix the calf

incident, and the subsequent relaxing of the cull". Since they had tightened

restrictions, and reinforced the cull, they have been in controll again!!

Then the lies really started. When asked why they had said it would be over

by June, when it patently wasn't, King insisted they had never implied such

a thing - he had always said it would tail into the autumn. They just meant

that the worst would be over by then.

Then he was asked why we had not vaccinated. He said vaccination had only

ever been considered in one case - that of the housed cows in Cumbria. And

there was me thinking Blair had made plans to vaccinate in Devon! And it got

worse - apparently if we had vaccinated we would have had to cull even more

animals, because, as the Dutch found, you have to cull vaccinated animals!

Furthermore if we had vaccinated, we would not have been able to clear whole

areas with blood testing, because serological testing would not have

worked!!

 

Need I go on? He finished by completely contradicting himself and suggesting

they are planning a vaccination program when this outbreak is over, to guard

against any future outbreaks .....

 

Words fail me. I can feel my blood pressure rising as I type, but let's not

lose sight of the problem here - something is up. I don't know what yet, but

perhaps Thursday's program will throw more light on it?

 

On a different matter - as far as I know you can't AI sheep, which is why

you can't buy semen - it just doesn't work for some reason. Perhaps it's

just difficult to administer, or has a low success rate. I have wondered

what the RBST are planning to do with the semen bank they have set up

though - I mean it's not much use if you can't get it into a sheep, is it?

Why not ask your vet - give him something to think about! Or you could try

visiting a ram, armed with a Durex and a large syringe! Seriously though,

there are FMD restrictions associated with the purchase of semen, even

supposing you could get it. As they change every day, you'd have to ask

Defra.

 

And on that happy note I'll sign off - Diana.

 

**********************************

 

A self-explanatory news release from Alistair:

 

 

This email has been sent to you by Alistair McConnachie, editor and

publisher of SOVEREIGNTY, a 4-page monthly journal for national

self-determination.

 

Now in the 27th consecutive monthly issue of SOVEREIGNTY we are pleased to

announce the launch of our website:

 

www.sovereignty.org.uk

 

Our website also includes pages specifically related to the Foot and Mouth

Scandal. The index for the Foot and Mouth info is at:

 

 

http://www.sovereignty.org.uk/features/footnmouth/fandmidx.html

 

Please help support this independent media project. Please consider passing

this information to interested contacts, and please include the following

contact information. Thank you.

 

A subscription for 12 issues is #15 payable to SOVEREIGNTY at 268 Bath

Street, Glasgow, G2 4JR; Tel: 0141 332 2214; Fax: 0141 353 6900;

admcc@admcc.freeserve.co.uk www.sovereignty.org.uk

 

********************************************

 

We had a long telephone conversation yesterday with Adrian Arbib the

photographer, who told us the sad tale of Hector Christie's pigs. Hector

has been trying for some time to sell weaners, but found himself caught

between the movement restrictions and the economic consequences of these.

Briefly, to move say three piglets to a prospective buyer would entail

cleaning and disinfection ( C & D) of the transport beforehand, veterinary

inspection of the animals, then C & D again afterwards, all of which would

cost considerably more than the sale price of the three little pigs. Hours

on the telephone to DEFRA produced conflicting information on who paid for

what, when and how, until in the end Hector decided that he simply could not

afford to go on feeding the rapidly-growing pigs any longer. He called in

his own vet to tranquillise and then kill them by lethal injection. A very

sad outcome for both Hector and the pigs, and all caused by "the policy".

 

Next time that you hear any politician or DEFRA official talking about

animal welfare, just remember those piglets.

 

 

*******************************************

 

 

This has no direct link to FMD, but you will all recognise the hidden agenda

here - from the Warmwell site:

 

 

Anger at secret monkey BSE tests

http://observer.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,560616,00.html

Anger at secret monkey BSE tests

Andrew Osborn Sunday September 30, 2001 The Observer

 

European Union scientists have secretly given their blessing to

controversial experiments in which live monkeys will be infected with mad

cow disease. In a move that has outraged animal rights campaigners, the EU's

most powerful scientific committee has concluded that 'important and

valuable information' can be gained from such experiments.

 

They believe the information will help scientists better understand how BSE

is caught, particularly by humans. The monkeys will be fed brain matter from

British and French meat infected with BSE.

 

The Observer has learnt that the European Commission, which relies on the

panel for advice, chose not to publicise the news despite new rules over

public access to information.

 

It chose instead to bury the contentious opinion on an obscure page on the

internet and did not issue a press release despite the fact that it is

routine practice to do so for significant opinions from the Scientific

Steering Committee.

 

The British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection (BUAV) has reacted with

fury to the news and said it was appalled to learn that the EU had approved

the use of primates in what it considers to be barbaric experiments.

 

'At a time when the moral justification for using primates is being

questioned this is clearly a backward step and will cause hideous suffering

to the animals involved,' said Sarah Kite, BUAV's information director.

'This research is likely to be misleading in trying to find a cure for this

human disease. Scientists are now realising that even using our closest

relatives, chimps, in Aids research is misleading.'

 

The committee stopped short of giving the go-ahead for large scale

experimentation on chimps although they did approve the use of chimps for

'future vaccine strategy evaluation.'

 

ENDS

 

 

 

From the Yorkshire Post:

 

 

Amy Binns

Tests show sheep exposed to disease

 

SHEEP are to be slaughtered near Skipton after tests showed they had been

exposed to foot and mouth.

 

The animals at Hyles Moor Farm, Wigglesworth, were checked as part of blood

tests throughout the Skipton and Settle area, and antibodies to the virus

were found in their blood.

 

A spokeswoman for the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

said the sheep were not believed to be infectious and were not thought to

have had the disease in the past.

 

They may have been exposed to a tiny amount of the virus, causing their

immune systems to develop antibodies in the same way as they would to a

vaccine.

 

More tests will be carried out on the sheep as there is a chance they have

had the disease in the past and recovered from it, but they are expected to

prove negative. If they prove positive, culls will be carried out on all

neighbouring farms.

 

There have been no outbreaks of foot and mouth in the Skipton-Settle cluster

since August 18. Fears that a new case had been found in

Horton-in-Ribblesdale proved groundless earlier this week when posthumous

tests proved negative.

 

ENDS

 

 

Our comment: So now sheep that "were not thought to have had the disease"

are slaughtered anyway - maybe the slaughter teams just like to keep their

hand in? What has this to do with disease control? But then, we all know

by now that the killing has nothing to do with disease control, and with

this announcement it seems that even DEFRA have stopped pretending that it

does any more.

 

 

 

Foot and Mouth lingers on

Channel Four News

 

It might be out of the headlines but foot and mouth disease certainly has

not gone away. According to Government scientists the epidemic could

continue for months - well into the spring. In the biggest analysis of the

disaster so far, two teams of researchers say about a million animals - and

four hundred farms - could have been saved if officials had acted sooner to

control the disease....Farmers in areas free of foot and mouth disease are

being warned tonight they're still at risk. According to two teams of

leading scientists - one working from Edinburgh and Oxford, the other in

London - the virus could jump out of the infected areas. The Derbyshire

Dales and south west Wales are named as potential danger spots. Their

analyses of the disaster, published in the leading journals, Science and

Nature, show the epidemic could continue into next spring - and what happens

in the coming months is crucial. Their figures show it need not have been

like this: If what was then the Ministry of Agriculture had acted

immediately on their advice to slaughter infected farms in 24 hours and

neighbouring or contiguous farms in 48 hours, a million of the 4 million

slaughtered animals would have been saved, and 400 of the 2,000 outbreaks

would have been averted. The figures show the number of cases started

falling before the scientists recommended the new strategy - they peaked at

50 a day at the end of March. This, it seems, was partly because many

farmers simply stopped moving around - so they stopped spreading the virus.

The numbers fell rapidly as the new policy - the 24/48 hour cull - kicked

in. But at the end of April came the rumpus over Phoenix the calf:

restrictions were relaxed, people became complacent and the numbers started

rising again. The clampdown on biosecurity at the end of May kept outbreaks

down to less then a ten a day - now there's an average of one a day: but the

situation will be critical for months to come. The reports suggest

vaccination would have helped if it had been used at the start of the

epidemic. And it's now clear that vaccination of all animals against foot

and mouth disease to prevent another disaster is at the top of the agenda.

Professor Anderson and his team are calling for a central database holding

details of all farm animals and where they go - and a contingency plan which

actually works.

Oct 4

 

ENDS

 

 

(See below for our comment)

 

 

From the BBC website:

 

 

4 October, 2001

Cull delay 'worsened epidemic'

 

 

Expert advice was not immediately followed up

 

The foot-and-mouth crisis in the UK would now be over had a more aggressive

culling programme been implemented earlier in the crisis.

 

 

Had the policy been implemented from April, we believe case numbers would

have been reduced by at least 20% overall

 

 

That is the conclusion of two detailed scientific assessments of the

epidemic published in the leading journals Nature and Science.

 

Researchers from Imperial College, London, believe that "at least a million"

fewer animals would need to have been slaughtered had ministry officials

acted sooner on expert advice.

 

Since February this year, more than 3.8 million animals have been

slaughtered - and one or two cases are still being confirmed every week.

 

The new studies suggest a more robust approach early on would now have

brought the foot-and-mouth crisis to a complete end.

 

 

Fewer animals would need to have been slaughtered

 

Professor Roy Anderson, one of the government's chief advisers, said tension

between Ministry of Agriculture (Maff) vets and independent advisers had

delayed the adoption of an aggressive culling policy.

 

This tension came to a head in March when mathematical models indicated the

best way to stamp out the epidemic. This policy of so-called contiguous

culling involved killing all animals on infected farms within 24 hours, and

those on adjacent farms within 48 hours.

 

However, the advice was not fully followed for several weeks.

 

Professor Anderson said vets resisted the policy, believing it to be too

rigid and draconian - and, he claimed, basing their stance on personal

opinion rather than hard scientific assessment.

 

He added: "The whole basis of the policy depends on speed of action and

efficiency of action and therefore delays in making those decisions about

which premises to remove - giving discretion to the local vets - was not

ideal."

 

One of the new studies' lead authors, Imperial's Professor Neil Ferguson,

told the BBC: "Had the policy been implemented from April, we believe case

numbers would have been reduced by at least 20% overall, and the number of

farms culled over the duration of the epidemic by approximately a third."

 

There were farmers taking injunctions out against the cull of contiguous

premises [and] that slowed down the cull process enormously

 

 

Professor Anderson said it was important that Maff's successor - the

Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) - took more

outside scientific advice.

 

But the government's chief scientific adviser, Professor David King,

insisted the government had actively sought and always listened to

independent advice.

 

He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "We brought the epidemic under

control towards the end of April, perhaps even earlier than that.

 

"We have to recognise that a degree of complacency crept in not only amongst

vets but the public and farmers. There were farmers taking injunctions out

against the cull of contiguous premises. That slowed down the cull process

enormously."

 

He conceded: "There was a period when the implementation of the policy was

not being achieved. It was not as efficiently run [as it should have been]."

 

Professor King added: "It could be over by Christmas; it could be over

before Christmas."

 

Meanwhile, additional work undertaken at Cambridge and Edinburgh

Universities, and at Defra, throws light on the controversial issue of

vaccination.

 

It concludes that vaccinating livestock - a strategy urged by some at the

height of the crisis but consistently rejected by the government - would

have had little impact on the spread of the disease.

 

Had immunisation been carried out from the start, together with all the

culling measures, the number of cases would only have been reduced by

between 15 and 20%, believes Dr Matt Keeling and colleagues.

 

"In the more likely scenario in which we vaccinated during the tail of the

epidemic from May onwards, we found there would only have been a small -

possibly one or 2% - decrease in the number of cases," Dr Keeling told the

BBC.

 

"So, although in some respects vaccination from early on would have been a

good policy, it looks as if you could actually better results by just

implementing the culling procedure more rapidly and more stringently from

earlier on."

 

ENDS

 

 

Our comment: So let's just get this straight - Roy (liar) Anderson & Co ar

e now saying:

 

1. If contiguous culling had been used from the start, fewer animals would

have died

2. If 24/48 hour slaughter on infected/contiguous farms had been

implemented sooner, fewer animals would have died

3. If some naughty farmers had not resisted the contiguous cull, fewer

animals would have died

4. If some naughty vets had not resisted the draconian culling policies

because of their "personal opinion rather than hard scientific assessment",

fewer animals would have died

5. If vaccination had been used from the start, between 15 and 20% fewer

animals would have died (according to Matt Keeling)

 

BUT - next time "vaccination is at the top of the agenda" !!!!!

 

Anderson and Co. seem to operate via an entirely different logic sequence to

the rest of the world. To respond to the abvoe points:

 

1. The contiguous cull has been criticised and discredited by every

scientist with veterinary scientific expertise in FMD throughout the world,

including the UK (Donaldson and Kitching)

2. By killing more healthy animals, more rapidly, somehow fewer animals

would have died? Oh really?

3. The annoying thing for Roy about naughty farmers like us, is that all

their animals subsequently blood-tested negative, thus proving

scientifically that countless thousands of uninfected animals around them

had been slaughtered for no reason, and discrediting the contiguous cull

even more (if that were possible)

4. We have read the original "hard scientific assessment" that was the

basis of Anderson's computer modelling hypothesis - and there isn't any

science in it at all, only his assumptions based on - you've guessed it -

personal opinion!

5. If vaccination is such a poor alternative, howcome a)the rest of the

world uses it so effectively; and b) the UK is clearly going to use it "next

time"?

 

No, Roy, you couldn't lie your way out of the Oxford situation, and you

can't lie your way out of this one either. Your contiguous culls, so

enthusiastically promoted by you and your Royal Society fellows, have been

an abject failure by any yardstick other than your own. No-one can possibly

take you seriously any more.

 

*********************************************

 

 

From the Ananova website:

 

Foot-and-mouth inquiry to be broadcast live via internet

 

A public inquiry into foot-and-mouth disease being coordinated by Devon

County Council is to be broadcast live via the internet. It is believed to

be the first time an inquiry in public has been accessible in sound and

pictures over the world wide web. A total of five cameras will transmit

pictures from the inquiry, to be held over five days from next Monday at the

authority's headquarters in Exeter. The internet service will be available

on Devon's website. There were 173 cases of the disease confirmed in Devon

during the crisis. Since the inquiry was announced on August 22, more than

350 detailed submissions have been sent to the inquiry's co-ordinating unit

at Devon county hall. Story filed: 17:44 Wednesday 3rd October 2001

 

ENDS

 

**********************************

 

 

Finally, Tom is puzzled by a previous joke but supplies a new one:

 

 

Hi Alan & Rosie,

 

I am still trying to work out C D's. In the meantime another joke for you:

 

A blind man enjoyed parachute jumping and a friend asked him how he figured

out the right time to bend his knees for the the landing?

 

Easy, says the blind man, I just wait for the dog lead to go slack.

 

 

 

Dear Tom,

 

Solution to CD joke: Where does Saddam Hussein keep his CD's?

 

Ans: In Iraq (pronounce as "in a rack")

 

 

Groan.

 

 

from Alan & Rosie